Close Cookie Notice

Welcome to the MIT CISR website!

This site uses cookies. Review our Privacy Statement.

Red briefing graphic
Research Briefing

Maximizing Returns from Data Monetization Strategies

What are the strategy-specific practices that maximize the impact of your data initiatives on strategic business outcomes?
By Nick van der Meulen, Barbara H. Wixom, and Cynthia M. Beath
Abstract

While organizations generally recognize data’s potential to drive business value, many still struggle to realize substantial financial returns from their data monetization strategies. Beyond selecting a strategy, we identified a more critical differentiator for success: data monetization impact. This briefing explores the strategy-specific practices that enable organizations to achieve this impact on strategic business outcomes, providing guidance for leaders seeking to maximize the return on their investments in data initiatives.

Access More Research!

Any visitor to the website can read many MIT CISR Research Briefings in the webpage. But site users who have signed up on the site and are logged in can download all available briefings, plus get access to additional content. Even more content is available to members of MIT CISR member organizations.

Author Barb Wixom reads this research briefing as part of our audio edition of the series. Follow the series on SoundCloud.

DOWNLOAD THE TRANSCRIPT

Large established organizations allocate on average US$80 million—approximately 2 percent of annual revenue—to their data budgets, according to a recent MIT CISR survey.[foot]This briefing reflects findings from the 2024 MIT CISR Data Monetization: Generating Financial Returns from Data and Analytics Survey (N=349). The survey was distributed globally from August 2023 to August 2024 to senior executives possessing an understanding of their organization’s enterprise-level data activities and outcomes. The reported average data budget of US$80 million applies to organizations in the survey with revenues of at least US$3 billion (40 percent). Generally this briefing reports insights from across organizations in the survey, including those with revenues of at least US$3 billion and those with revenues between US$500 million and US$3 billion (23 percent) and under $500 million (37 percent).[/foot] Yet while some organizations struggle to recoup data investments, others achieve returns that far exceed their initial outlays. A key factor in these disparities is the organization’s chosen data monetization strategy: a high-level plan that communicates how the organization will improve its bottom line using its data assets.

MIT CISR research has identified four data monetization strategies, each of which reflects a distinct portfolio of initiatives that focus on data monetization approaches for improving (optimizing internal processes and decisions), wrapping (delivering a product enhancement that customers value), and selling (developing new revenue-generating information solutions). These strategies are:

  • Operational optimization: This relies on streamlining work tasks and eliminating inefficiencies, primarily from improving initiatives.
  • Customer focus: This relies on delighting customers and serving them cost efficiently, using a mix of wrapping and improving initiatives.
  • Information business: This relies on leveraging data assets to solve problems for other organizations or consumer markets, using selling initiatives to produce information offerings and wrapping initiatives to sustain the sales of those offerings.
  • Future ready: This enables and encourages the use of improving, wrapping, and selling initiatives, as needed, to improve customer experience while simplifying operations and generating novel business models and revenue streams.

Yet while these strategies help to guide organizations’ investments in data initiatives, our research shows that organizations experience vastly different levels of monetization returns—even when following the same strategy (see table 1). The organizations that achieve the strongest returns in relation to their budgets are those that demonstrate high data monetization impact, which we define as the extent to which an organization’s data initiatives help the organization realize its strategic business outcomes.[foot]To determine data monetization impact, we asked respondents to report the extent to which their organization’s data monetization initiatives (1) contributed to overall revenues, (2) reduced operating expenses, (3) enabled changes to the business model, and (4) provided a competitive advantage. These are four outcomes that organizations typically seek to achieve by monetizing data, and that statistically correlate strongly with financial and non-financial measures of firm performance.[/foot]

What distinguishes high-impact organizations is their ability to execute their chosen strategies effectively, by adopting strategy-specific practices that translate their aspirations into results. This briefing explores these practices and provides guidance for leaders looking to maximize their data monetization returns.

Table 1: Data monetization strategy characteristics by extent of data monetization impact*

  Operational optimization (N=123) Customer focus (N=104) Information business (N=29) Future ready (N=40)
Focus of data monetization initiatives Improving Improving and wrapping Wrapping and selling Improving, wrapping, and selling
Data monetization impact N=

Low

94

High

29

Low

65

High

39

Low

16

High

13

Low

16

High

24

Avg. data budget (in US$ million) $43 $30 $41 $38 $46 $27 $14 $27
Avg. data monetization returns (in US$ million) $30 $27 $27 $177 $15 $784 $111 $223
Avg. percentage of revenues (or equivalent) from data monetization 3.0% 3.9% 4.7% 20.4% 7.8% 38.1% 3.6% 21.7%

* This table illustrates that organizations achieving high data monetization impact realize greater financial returns, regardless of their chosen strategy. A comparison of average data budgets and returns underscores that impact—not budget size—drives monetization success. Additionally, organizations achieving high impact attribute a substantially larger share of their total revenues to data monetization, further highlighting the importance of effective strategy execution.

* Note that these responses total less than 349, as some organizations either lacked a data monetization strategy (N=30) or did not answer all questions (N=23). The 296 organizations with a strategy were grouped as Low or High Impact (≤3 or >3 on a 5-point scale) based on their average answers to the measures of data monetization impact. By comparing the two groups’ scores across 88 practices, we were able to identify practices where the differences were both statistically significant and meaningful for a particular data monetization strategy.

Strategy 1: Operational Optimization

Organizations pursuing operational optimization use data to enhance efficiency, such as to improve processes. But organizations achieving high data monetization impact take this further: they realize enterprise-scale efficiencies from developing what we call liquid data assets—data assets that are easily recombined, reused, and shared. In our research, at organizations with high impact, employee wait times for data access were cut in half—to an average of five days’ wait from eleven days at organizations with low impact; and employees were able to devote 50 percent of their time to deriving insights, compared to just 30 percent at organizations with low impact.

To sustain these efficiencies, high-impact organizations clearly articulate their data and analytics aspirations in data strategies that make a compelling case for adopting better, cheaper, and faster ways of working. Leaders play a central role in advocating for the combination and reuse of data assets, thereby ensuring that data-driven improvement initiatives become an embedded part of organizational operations.

Amcor, a global packaging organization, exemplifies this approach. Amcor invested in a product specification data asset that made the complex recipes for making its products accessible throughout the enterprise.[foot]R. V. Bradley, B. H. Wixom, and C. M. Beath, “Internal Data Sharing: Four Examples,” MIT CISR Working Paper No. 459, May 2023, https://cisr.mit.edu/publication/MIT_CISRwp459_DataSharingExamples_BradleyWixomBeath.[/foot] This supported a diverse array of initiatives, including supplier risk management, regulatory compliance, and sustainability reporting. To enable this, Amcor’s data unit established a cloud-based data lake, installed a standard reporting tool, and implemented semiautomated data governance processes. These investments not only reduced the time employees spent preparing and organizing data but also strengthened enterprise-wide data sharing, allowing teams to use specification data for multiple process optimization efforts.

Strategy 2: Customer Focus

Organizations that pursue a customer focus strategy invest in initiatives that delight customers while optimizing costs. High data monetization impact organizations following this strategy recognize that employees are the key to delivering exceptional customer experiences—and that equipping them with data and analytics is essential to their success. As such, they ensure that customer-facing data initiatives incorporate data-driven decision-making into employees’ daily workflows. They train employees to use data effectively, assess their ability to take data-informed actions, and provide incentives to encourage the use of enterprise data assets. To reduce friction, high-impact organizations, for instance, automate privacy controls and enable experimentation techniques such as A/B testing, allowing employees to refine and personalize customer interactions in real time.

A strong data culture further amplifies these efforts. High-impact organizations give employees broad access to relevant data and cultivate an environment where data use is encouraged and expected. These leaders don’t just advocate for data-driven decisions; they actively integrate data and analytics into strategic discussions, strengthening the organization’s market position. By articulating how data differentiates the organization and raises customer willingness to pay, they reinforce its competitive advantage.

Fidelity Investments, a Boston-based financial services organization, provides an example of this strategy in action.[foot]Barbara H. Wixom, Gabriele Piccoli, and Joaquin Rodriguez, “Fast-Track Data Monetization with Strategic Data Assets,” MIT Sloan Management Review, July 29, 2021, https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/fast-track-data-monetization-with-strategic-data-assets/.[/foot] To strengthen data-driven customer engagement, it developed a common analytics platform that centralized curated customer data and other priority subject areas. The platform leader established a vision to create long-term data assets, ensuring value for both known use cases and future opportunities. Fidelity created customer profiles to provide a 360-degree view of each customer to simplify account management across all interaction channels. The platform functioned as an internal marketplace, with a governance framework ensuring compliance with privacy, legal, contractual, and ethical policies. Employees requested access via a semiautomated workflow—ensuring secure and timely availability. These investments enabled Fidelity to increase customer value, boost revenue, and improve operational efficiency.

Strategy 3: Information Business

The information business strategy involves offering market-facing information solutions that address customer needs. Organizations seeking new digital business opportunities are increasingly turning to this strategy, which has long been common among veteran data companies like Experian and LexisNexis. High data monetization impact organizations in this category differentiate themselves by developing marketplace solutions at scale. They focus on productizing data and analytics, ensuring that offerings are cost-effective and in line with market demands. These organizations excel at product management, tracking metrics such as data usage, consumer satisfaction, deployment speed, and financial impact to drive continuous improvement.

To succeed, information business organizations must balance external responsiveness with internal coordination. A strong chief data office plays a pivotal role in aligning enterprise-wide data activities, ensuring that data assets and capabilities are shared, governed, and leveraged effectively across the organization. This helps organizations break down silos while simultaneously enabling innovation.

Wolters Kluwer, a global provider of information, software, and services for professionals, represents what we consider an example of this strategy through its investment in expert solutions.[foot]B. H. Wixom, C. M. Beath, J. Duane, and N. van der Meulen, “Wolters Kluwer’s Expert Solutions Journey,” MIT CISR Working Paper No. 465, November 2024; https://cisr.mit.edu/publication/MIT_CISRwp465_WoltersKluwerExpertSolutions_WixomBeathDuaneVanderMeulen.[/foot] To support this new direction, the CEO and leadership team articulated expert solutions as a strategic priority and structured the organization for scalable growth. They created corporate-level shared services to support areas such as innovation and product management. Over time, the organization invested in centers of excellence that equipped divisions with pricing, measurement, and other product management expertise needed to scale the growth of new data-driven products. By 2023, expert solutions became the organization’s fastest-growing product line, achieving 8 percent organic revenue growth.

Strategy 4: Future Ready

The future-ready strategy positions data monetization as an enterprise priority. Organizations following this strategy leverage data across business functions, enabling innovation, and identifying new business opportunities. This strategy appeals to born-digital organizations and those with modernized technology portfolios.

High data monetization impact organizations following this strategy foster data democracies by empowering employees to access, share, and exploit data, and they keep their democracies on track by setting and communicating strategic data priorities internally and externally via the annual report and other formal reporting channels. They enable their data democracies by investing in reusable data assets and capabilities, and they establish effective data sharing across the enterprise and with customers and partners. These organizations incorporate data-driven behaviors into performance management, for example, by evaluating employees based on their ability to use data effectively and rewarding them for contributing to data monetization initiatives. As a result, high-impact future-ready organizations recoup their data liquidity investments in half the time of lower-impact organizations.

In our view, Cemex, a global construction materials organization, pursued a future-ready strategy after years of investing in initiatives that enhanced customer experience and streamlined operations.[foot]I. A. Someh, B. H. Wixom, C. M. Beath, and R. W. Gregory, “The Cemex Journey to AI at Scale,” MIT CISR Working Paper No. 463, July 2024, https://cisr.mit.edu/publication/MIT_CISRwp463_CemexAIatScale_SomehWixomBeathGregory.[/foot] Having made significant progress, the organization’s leadership recognized a broader opportunity: leveraging its digital capabilities (particularly in data science) beyond enterprise boundaries. For example, in mid-2022, Cemex launched Arkik, a new venture that commercialized an internal IT solution by selling it to competitors. The move underscored the organization’s shift from using data solely for internal purposes to leveraging it as a basis for market-facing offerings. Cemex’s annual reports reflected this as well, highlighting key achievements in efficiency, customer satisfaction, and sustainability—where it was expanding its offerings with new information solutions.

From Strategy to Impact

The first step in realizing data monetization returns is selecting a strategy that matches your organization’s current abilities and long-term aspirations. Organizations focused on building foundational data monetization capabilities may find operational optimization to be the right fit. Those looking to enhance customer relationships while improving efficiency should consider the customer focus strategy. Organizations seeking to generate new revenue streams can explore the information business strategy, while those aiming to scale data-driven innovation across the enterprise should invest in a future-ready approach.

Once you’ve chosen your strategy, turn your attention to focused execution. Success lies not in the size of your data budget but in how effectively you leverage resources. Those who invest deliberately in the practices described in this briefing position themselves to realize significant returns from their data initiatives. Data is one of your organization’s most valuable assets—but only if you are invested in having it make an impact.

© 2025 MIT Center for Information Systems Research, Van der Meulen, Wixom, and Beath. MIT CISR Research Briefings are published monthly to update the center’s member organizations on current research projects.

About the Researchers

Profile picture for user cynthia.beath@mccombs.utexas.edu

Cynthia M. Beath, Professor Emerita, University of Texas and Academic Research Fellow, MIT CISR

MIT CENTER FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH (CISR)

Founded in 1974 and grounded in MIT's tradition of combining academic knowledge and practical purpose, MIT CISR helps executives meet the challenge of leading increasingly digital and data-driven organizations. We work directly with digital leaders, executives, and boards to develop our insights. Our consortium forms a global community that comprises more than seventy-five organizations.

MIT CISR Patrons
AlixPartners
Avanade
Cognizant
Collibra
IFS
The Ogilvy Group
MIT CISR Sponsors
Alcon Vision
Amcor
ANZ Banking Group (Australia)
AustralianSuper
Banco Bradesco S.A. (Brazil)
Banco do Brasil S.A.
Bank of Queensland (Australia)
Barclays (UK)
BlueScope Steel (Australia)
BNP Paribas (France)
Bupa
CarMax
Caterpillar, Inc.
Cemex (Mexico)
Cencora
CIBC (Canada)
Cochlear Limited (Australia)
Commonwealth Superannuation Corp. (Australia)
Cuscal Limited (Australia)
CVS Health
Dawn Foods
DBS Bank Ltd. (Singapore)
Doosan Corporation (Korea)
Fidelity Investments
Fomento Economico Mexicano, S.A.B., de C.V.
Fortum (Finland)
Genentech
Gilbane Building Co.
International Motors
Jewelers Mutual
Kaiser Permanente
Keurig Dr Pepper
King & Wood Mallesons (Australia)
Mater Private Hospital (Ireland)
Nasdaq, Inc.
NN Insurance Eurasia NV
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (Japan)
Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. Systems Consulting Division (Japan)
Novo Nordisk A/S (Denmark)
OCP Group
Pacific Life Insurance Company
Pentagon Federal Credit Union
Posten Bring AS (Norway)
Principal Life Insurance Company
QBE
Ramsay Health Care (Australia)
Reserve Bank of Australia
RTX
Saint-Gobain
Scentre Group Limited (Australia)
Schneider Electric Industries SAS (France)
Tabcorp Holdings (Australia)
Telstra Limited (Australia)
Terumo Corporation (Japan)
Tetra Pak (Sweden)
Truist Financial Corporation
UniSuper Management Pty Ltd (Australia)
Uniting (Australia)
USAA
Vanguard
Westpac Banking Corporation (Australia)
WestRock Company
Xenco Medical
Zoetis Services LLC
​Wolters Kluwer Financial & Corporate Compliance

MIT CISR Associate Members

MIT CISR wishes to thank all of our associate members for their support and contributions.

Find Us
Center for Information Systems Research
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Sloan School of Management
245 First Street, E94-15th Floor
Cambridge, MA 02142
617-253-2348