Close Cookie Notice

Welcome to the MIT CISR website!

This site uses cookies. Review our Privacy Statement.

Red briefing graphic
Research Briefing

Business Value from Digital Sustainability

Companies achieve value from sustainability by embedding sustainability goals into company strategy and then developing capabilities to advance these goals.
Abstract

Sustainability is a cost of doing business for many companies today—but it is also an opportunity for creating value. Companies only achieve value, however, by embedding sustainability goals into company strategy and then developing capabilities to advance these goals. Our survey analysis suggested that there are four distinct strategic sustainability goals: compliance and efficiency, customer and investor reputation, new revenue, and company purpose. Companies in the research that pursued strategic sustainability goals beyond compliance and efficiency saw bottom-line impacts such as greater EBIT, more revenues from innovation, and improved customer experience.

Access More Research!

Any visitor to the website can read many MIT CISR Research Briefings in the webpage. But site users who have signed up on the site and are logged in can download all available briefings, plus get access to additional content. Even more content is available to members of MIT CISR member organizations.

Author Ina Sebastian reads this research briefing as part of our audio edition of the series. Follow the series on SoundCloud.

DOWNLOAD THE TRANSCRIPT

Earlier MIT CISR research showed that companies build three types of digital sustainability capabilities to scale carbon emission reduction: green IT, green products, and green digital offerings.[foot]I. M. Sebastian, T. Haskamp, and S. L. Woerner, “Creating an Enterprise Capability for Digital Sustainability,” MIT CISR Research Briefing, Vol. XXIV, No. 3, March 2024, https://cisr.mit.edu/publication/2024_0301_GreenCIO_SebastianHaskampWoerner.[/foot] Based on a recent survey, companies that do this make significant progress on sustainability. The survey found that from 2022 to 2023, companies in the top quartile on digital sustainability were 15 percent better at improving their sustainability than companies in the bottom quartile, and the top quartile companies were 19 percent more effective at incorporating circularity principles.[foot]Statistical results are based on an analysis of the annual Swiss Manufacturing Survey 2024, N=360 from 339 Swiss manufacturing companies in 21 industries. Thirty percent of participants reported global production locations. MIT CISR collaborated with the Institute of Technology Management, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland on the survey research by adding questions to the survey and conducting analysis for this research briefing.[/foot] Sustainability is becoming a performance metric and an important issue for both senior executives and boards; for example, in 2024, 24 percent of publicly traded companies had a board committee with ESG as part of its mandate.[foot]Company board committee information downloaded from BoardEx, a company board of directors database. MIT CISR researchers categorized board committees into fourteen different topics, one of which was sustainability.[/foot]

But in the recent survey, we also found that being a high performer on digital sustainability did not directly differentiate company performance. This lack of bottom-line impact makes it hard for companies to view sustainability as an opportunity for value creation rather than solely a cost of doing business—perhaps explaining some of the corporate pushback on sustainability investments.[foot]Mary Foley, “Do Businesses Need to Rethink their Approach to Sustainability Now?,” Forbes, December 16, 2024, https://www.forbes.com/sites/maryfoley/2024/12/16/do-businesses-need-to-rethink-their-approach-to-sustainability-now/. [/foot]

The survey research did find, however, that companies that pursued strategic sustainability goals saw bottom-line impacts. This briefing explores how and when companies create business value from digital sustainability, and the relationship between strategic sustainability goals and digital sustainability capabilities.

Strategic Goals Matter

The key to jointly improving sustainability outcomes and business performance is not just building digital sustainability capabilities but also leveraging the capabilities strategically to achieve specific goals. Our survey analysis suggested that there are four distinct strategic sustainability goals—compliance and efficiency, customer and investor reputation, new revenue, and company purpose—and the company performance profile for each goal is unique (see figure 1). Companies can pursue more than one goal if they are able to manage more complexity.[foot]In the Swiss Manufacturing Survey 2024 we asked, “What is driving your company toward sustainability?” and respondents rated a set of drivers from not relevant to very relevant. We created four distinct strategic goals based on different drivers. Using ANOVAs, we analyzed how the top versus the bottom quartile of companies that pursued each strategic sustainability goal differed regarding their progress on sustainability, business value, and digital sustainability capabilities. The reported results were statistically significant (p<.05 level).[/foot]

Figure 1: Differences in Value and Capabilities Between the Top and Bottom Quartile on Each Strategic Sustainability Goal

 

Source: Swiss Manufacturing Survey 2024, N=360. Based on ANOVAs, we analyzed how the top versus the bottom quartile of companies that pursued each strategic sustainability goal differed regarding their progress on sustainability improvement, business value, and digital sustainability capabilities. The reported results were statistically significant (p<.05 level).

Sustainability Improvement: A ✓ represents a significant difference in sustainability improvement from 2022 to 2023 between the top and bottom quartile for the associated goal; an X represents no significant difference.

Business Value: Where a value metric is stated, there was a significant difference between the top and bottom quartile for the associated goal; an X represents no significant difference.

Digital Sustainability Capabilities: For each goal, the top quartile built significantly more of the specified capabilities than the bottom quartile.

  1. Compliance and efficiency: These companies’ primary drivers for sustainability efforts are regulations, cost reduction and operational efficiency, and risk minimization. Companies in the top versus bottom quartile on this goal showed no significant differences on any metric we measured regarding sustainability improvements or business value.
  2. Customer and investor reputation: These companies orient sustainability initiatives to customer demand, investor requirements, and attractiveness to talent. Companies in the top versus bottom quartile on this goal made significantly more progress over a year on improving sustainability (16 percent higher); they performed better at implementing circularity principles (16 percent higher); and they achieved greater EBIT (17 percent more in Switzerland and 42 percent more abroad).
  3. New revenue: These companies describe sustainability as a source of innovative capacity and competitiveness. Companies in the top versus bottom quartile on this goal made significantly more progress over a year on improving sustainability (9 percent higher) and innovative capacity (12 percent higher), and they had more revenues from innovation (53 percent more).
  4. Company purpose: These companies consider social responsibility and green corporate image to be very important goals. Companies in the top versus bottom quartile on this goal made significantly more progress over a year on improving sustainability (22 percent higher) and improving customer experience (13 percent higher), and they performed better at implementing circularity principles (22 percent higher).

The results in this research study suggest that when considering sustainability initiatives, adopting clear strategic goals and moving beyond compliance and efficiency pays off with both greater sustainability improvement and greater business value. Jean-Pascal Tricoire, chairman of the global energy management company Schneider Electric, argued in a recent conversation with Peter Weill that, besides efficiencies, there are enormous strategic opportunities to sustainability.

We start with efficiency, and efficiency pays for the investment. But then it brings collateral advantages— like safety of operators, like uptime of installations because you can detect outages before they happen.

Jean-Pascal Tricore, Chairman, Schneider Electric[foot]Peter Weill and Jean-Pascal Tricore, “Conversation between Jean-Pascal Tricoire and Peter Weill,” MIT CISR Video, December 2024, https://cisr.mit.edu/publication/conversation-between-jean-pascal-tricoire-and-peter-weill-video.[/foot]

Strategic Goals Guide Digital Sustainability

In the earlier MIT CISR research, we identified three types of digital sustainability capabilities that companies can develop for use in carbon emission reduction:

  • Green IT: This capability focuses on replacing carbon-intensive technologies, and captures tracking and optimizing of technology emissions.
  • Green products: This capability focuses on decarbonizing products and production, and captures tracking and optimizing product emissions.
  • Green digital offerings: This capability focuses on providing digital offerings that have lower carbon footprints or that help suppliers, partners, and customers track and manage their emissions.

To provide guidance to leaders about where to focus their efforts on building capabilities, we analyzed the relationships between these capabilities and strategic sustainability goals (as shown in figure 1). Replacing carbon-intensive technology with green IT is a baseline. Companies in the top quartiles on each of the goals were significantly better than those in the bottom quartiles on green IT. Green IT is becoming increasingly important as companies incorporate carbon-intensive generative AI into enterprise processes and work.

Companies that focus on the customer and investor reputation, new revenue, and company purpose goals must build, in addition to green IT, digital sustainability capabilities in green products, green digital offerings, or both. Companies in the top quartile on the customer and investor reputation goal built significantly stronger capabilities in green digital offerings. Companies in the top quartile on the new revenue goal built significantly stronger capabilities in green products. And companies in the top quartile on the company purpose goal built significantly stronger capabilities in both green products and green digital offerings.

Bupa, the international healthcare company, is an example of a purpose-driven company developing all three digital sustainability capabilities.

Bupa Is on a Mission to Be Sustainable

Bupa’s purpose-driven goal, named Mission 2040, is to build a healthier future for people and planet through decarbonization, sustainable healthcare, and digitization of products and services. As the company undergoes a digital business transformation to achieve this purpose, it is progressing on all three types of digital sustainability capabilities.

Green IT: In 2022, leaders in the company’s Technology division began to build a green IT capability. They focused on increasing Bupa’s systems hosted in the cloud and increasing the company’s IT spend with suppliers that align with Bupa’s net zero ambitions.[foot]Sebastian, Haskamp, and Woerner, “Creating an Enterprise Capability for Digital Sustainability.”[/foot] By 2024, Bupa had 88 percent of systems hosted in the cloud (from 41 percent in 2022) and 71 percent of IT spend with aligned suppliers (from 31 percent in 2022[foot]Bupa, “Bupa Annual Report 2023,” ESG section, March 21, 2024, 36, https://www.bupa.com/~/media/files/b/bupa-v5/documents/annual-report-2023/bupa-sustainability-and-esg-section-ar2023.pdf.[/foot]).

Green products: Bupa is reducing the environmental impact of care, for example, by reducing emissions associated with anesthetic gases across its global businesses. In addition, Bupa has expanded its sustainable procurement program—which includes ESG assessment in supplier onboarding and partnering—to the whole supply chain.[foot]“Bupa Annual Report 2023,” ESG section.[/foot]

Green digital offerings: Bupa is also reducing carbon emissions by developing digital health offerings that enable greater access to healthcare with a lower carbon footprint. By mid-2024, the number of customers using the company’s digital health app, Blua, grew 24 percent[foot]Percentage change calculated based on Bupa, “Half Year Results Presentation” for the six months ending June 30, 2024, https://www.bupa.com/~/media/files/b/bupa-v5/documents/financials/results-centre/2024/bupa-group-bond-holder-results-presentation-half-year-2024.pdf and “Full Year Results Presentation” for the twelve months ending December 31, 2023, https://www.bupa.com/~/media/files/b/bupa-v5/documents/financials/results-centre/2023/bupa-group-results-presentation-fy2023.pdf. [/foot] from the previous year. And in Spain, the app’s CO2 calculator shows customers the carbon emissions they avoided generating by using a virtual appointment instead of travelling.[foot]“Our Sustainability Missions,” Impact, Bupa, accessed January 7, 2025, https://www.bupa.com/impact/sustainability/our-sustainability-missions.[/foot]

Bupa’s Technology and Sustainability teams collaborate to connect the digital business transformation with sustainability, focusing on using digital technology to improve both sustainability outcomes and customer health outcomes. This includes greater access to healthcare and preventive care (i.e., green digital offerings) and smart hospitals (i.e., green products).

Embed Sustainability in Your Strategy

Sustainability is a cost of doing business for many companies today—but it is also an opportunity for creating value. Your company can only achieve value, however, by embedding sustainability goals into company strategy. Improving sustainability capabilities to satisfy customer or investor demands, to build innovation and competitiveness, or to become a socially responsible enterprise is linked to real business value like increases in EBIT, innovation, and customer experience. Your company may want to do it all, but building enterprise capabilities is an increasing commitment. Be clear about your goals and then develop sustainability capabilities to advance these goals.

© 2025 MIT Center for Information Systems Research, Sebastian, Woerner, Weill, and Woerner. MIT CISR Research Briefings are published monthly to update the center’s member organizations on current research projects.

About the Researchers

Profile picture for user daniel.woerner@unisg.ch

Daniel Woerner, PostDoc, Institute of Technology Management, University of St. Gallen, and Research Collaborator, MIT CISR

MIT CENTER FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH (CISR)

Founded in 1974 and grounded in MIT's tradition of combining academic knowledge and practical purpose, MIT CISR helps executives meet the challenge of leading increasingly digital and data-driven organizations. We work directly with digital leaders, executives, and boards to develop our insights. Our consortium forms a global community that comprises more than seventy-five organizations.

MIT CISR Patrons
AlixPartners
Avanade
Cognizant
Collibra
IFS
The Ogilvy Group
MIT CISR Sponsors
Alcon Vision
Amcor
ANZ Banking Group (Australia)
AustralianSuper
Banco Bradesco S.A. (Brazil)
Banco do Brasil S.A.
Bank of Queensland (Australia)
Barclays (UK)
BlueScope Steel (Australia)
BNP Paribas (France)
Bupa
CarMax
Caterpillar, Inc.
Cemex (Mexico)
Cencora
CIBC (Canada)
Cochlear Limited (Australia)
Commonwealth Superannuation Corp. (Australia)
Cuscal Limited (Australia)
CVS Health
Dawn Foods
DBS Bank Ltd. (Singapore)
Doosan Corporation (Korea)
Fidelity Investments
Fomento Economico Mexicano, S.A.B., de C.V.
Fortum (Finland)
Genentech
Gilbane Building Co.
International Motors
Jewelers Mutual
Kaiser Permanente
Keurig Dr Pepper
King & Wood Mallesons (Australia)
Mater Private Hospital (Ireland)
Nasdaq, Inc.
NN Insurance Eurasia NV
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (Japan)
Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. Systems Consulting Division (Japan)
Novo Nordisk A/S (Denmark)
OCP Group
Pacific Life Insurance Company
Pentagon Federal Credit Union
Posten Bring AS (Norway)
Principal Life Insurance Company
QBE
Ramsay Health Care (Australia)
Reserve Bank of Australia
RTX
Saint-Gobain
Scentre Group Limited (Australia)
Schneider Electric Industries SAS (France)
Tabcorp Holdings (Australia)
Telstra Limited (Australia)
Terumo Corporation (Japan)
Tetra Pak (Sweden)
Truist Financial Corporation
UniSuper Management Pty Ltd (Australia)
Uniting (Australia)
USAA
Vanguard
Westpac Banking Corporation (Australia)
WestRock Company
Xenco Medical
Zoetis Services LLC

MIT CISR Associate Members

MIT CISR wishes to thank all of our associate members for their support and contributions.

Find Us
Center for Information Systems Research
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Sloan School of Management
245 First Street, E94-15th Floor
Cambridge, MA 02142
617-253-2348