Close Cookie Notice

Welcome to the MIT CISR website!

This site uses cookies. Review our Privacy Statement.

Red briefing graphic
Research Briefing

Building Business Agility: Cloud-Based Services and Digitized Platform Maturity

Not all firms investing in cloud-based services are competitively agile. What does it take to become more agile using cloud-based services?
Abstract

The most alluring quality of cloud services is their potential to increase business agility. However, not all firms investing in cloud-based services are competitively agile. What does it take to become more agile using cloud-based services? MIT CISR research found that a mature digitized platform is a critical success factor. This briefing draws on findings from a survey of 300 companies and examples of initiatives at Schneider Electric and Ferrovial to explain how cloud services both depend on and can contribute to a mature digitized platform that enables competitive agility.

Access More Research!

Any visitor to the website can read many MIT CISR Research Briefings in the webpage. But site users who have signed up on the site and are logged in can download all available briefings, plus get access to additional content. Even more content is available to members of MIT CISR member organizations.

The most alluring quality of cloud services is their potential to increase business agility.[foot]J.G. Mooney, J.W. Ross, and J. Phipps, “Embrace the Inevitable: Six Imperatives to Prepare Your Company for Cloud Computing,” MIT Sloan CISR Research Briefing, Vol. XII, No. 10, October 2012, https://cisr.mit.edu/blog/documents/2012/10/18/2012_1001_embraceinevitable_mooneyrossphipps.pdf/[/foot] However, not all firms investing in cloud-based services are competitively agile. What does it take to become more agile using cloud-based services? MIT CISR research found that a mature digitized platform is a critical success factor. 

This briefing examines how cloud services both depend on and can contribute to a mature digitized platform that enables competitive agility. To explain, we review findings from a 2013 survey of three hundred companies and share examples of initiatives at Schneider Electric and Ferrovial that involved using cloud technologies to address immediate business needs while strengthening platform capabilities. 

Digitized Platform Maturity Matters 

Over time, as a firm invests in new business processes and IT applications, it inevitably accumulates three types of system components: 

  1. Digital technologies that make up the new application, such as a system to handle customer complaints 
  2. Business processes that rely on those digital technologies, such as the processes by which customer complaints are handled using that system 
  3. Data that are drawn upon and generated by the processes that rely on the digital technologies, such as customer data and data from interactions between customers and the firm 
Digitized platform maturity is both essential to competitive agility and necessary to avoid wasting investments in IT.

Digitized platform maturity refers to the extent to which technologies, business processes, and data are sufficiently standardized and shared to meet business objectives. In contrast, when a firm develops new applications in an uncoordinated manner, it soon accumulates a disorderly collection of technologies, digitized processes, and data that we at MIT CISR refer to as “spaghetti.” 

Prior MIT CISR research has found that each firm matures its digitized platform in stages, typically standardizing and centralizing first technologies and then processes and/or data, depending on the firm’s operating model. Finally, as it develops greater understanding about its standardized components, the firm transforms them into components that can be more easily and quickly combined and reused.[foot]J.W. Ross, P. Weill, and D. Robertson, Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution, Harvard Business School Press, 2006.[/foot]

With the survey data, we approximated platform maturity from a composite of five questions about the extent to which firms had reached an efficient level of standardization and sharing across the organization in terms of the three types of system components. Firms that were below average had immature digitized platforms; firms that were above average had mature digitized platforms. 

Investments in Cloud‐Based Services Are Not Enough 

Cloud-based services represent a growing percentage of the total IT budget of most firms. In the 2013 survey[foot]N=307. Digitized platform results based on analysis conducted by N. Fonstad, N. Merdikawati, and E. Rodriguez-Montemayor for the research paper under review, “Making IT Matter: Digitized Platform Maturity, Cloud-based Services, and Firm Agility” (2014).[/foot]

  • About a fifth of participating firms (19%) were not investing in cloud-based services 
  • About half (49%) were investing less than 10% of their total IT budget in cloud-based services (“low investors”) 
  • About a third (33%) were investing more than 10% of their total IT budget in cloud-based services (“high investors”) 

We found that competitive agility was not related to companies’ relative investments in cloud services. Competitive agility refers to the ability to anticipate market changes and develop new products and services for both existing and new customers at better than the industry average. 

As shown in figure 1, low investors in cloud services had only a 24% chance of being competitively agile if they also had an immature digitized platform. Simply investing more in cloud-based services does not significantly improve the likelihood of being competitively agile: high investors with an immature platform had only a 36% chance of being competitively agile. Statistically, this is no different from low investors in cloud; if firms in this group had intended to become more agile with cloud-based services, most were wasting their investments. 

In contrast, firms that had a mature platform yet were low investors in cloud-based services had a 42% chance of being competitively agile—almost twice as likely as low investors with immature digitized platforms. Finally, firms that had both a mature platform and were high investors in cloud-based services had by far the greatest and most significant chance of being competitively agile:

In summary, the firms that were the most likely to be competitively agile were high investors in cloud services with mature digitized platforms. Digitized platform maturity is not only beneficial to achieving competitive agility; it is necessary to avoid wasting investments in digital technologies such as cloud-based services. 

Cloud services both depend on and can contribute to a mature digitized platform.

Using Cloud to Accelerate Digitized Platform Maturity

Building and sustaining a mature digitized platform is a challenging longterm commitment. If a company can’t just implement cloud services to address its need for business agility, how can one with an immature platform respond to the demands of the digital economy? Case studies provide evidence that, while cloud services alone won’t make a company agile, they can be adopted in ways that accelerate platform maturity. Both Schneider Electric and Ferrovial implemented cloud-based solutions to quickly build platform capabilities, and ultimately, business agility. 

Schneider Electric 

In 2009, senior management at Schneider Electric, a global energy management company, sought to expand the firm’s strategic focus significantly beyond “manufacturer and distributor of electrical products” to a “provider of intelligent energy management solutions.”[foot]A. Karunakaran, J. Mooney, and J.W. Ross, “Accelerating Global Digital Platform Deployment Using the Cloud: A Case Study of Schneider Electric’s ‘bridge Front Office’ Program,” MIT Sloan CISR Working Paper No. 399, January 2015, https://cisr.mit.edu/blog/documents/2015/01/16/mit_cisrwp399_schneiderelectric_karunakaranmooneyross.pdf/[/foot]However, after doubling its size in six years through a combination of organic growth and over two hundred acquisitions, the firm had accumulated an immature digitized platform that included fragmented critical enterprise processes. For example, local IT units had installed more than three hundred independent CRM systems. This “spaghetti” constrained development of the kinds of capabilities the company needed for cross-selling and collaboration, enterprise-wide standardization of sales and service processes, and a 360° view of the customer. Schneider Electric started to mature its platform by consolidating myriad local IT units into a single global IT function called IPO (Information, Process, and Organization). The resulting centralization and streamlining of IT processes increased internal efficiencies and enhanced global project and program management capabilities.[foot]Schneider Electric was listed in the 2011 InformationWeek 500 because of the benefits from IPO.[/foot]

In 2011, once IPO was formed, Schneider Electric was in a stronger position to invest in cloud-based services to provide a global CRM platform for enterprise-wide opportunity management and sales support. Within eighteen months, Schneider Electric completed global deployment to its 25,000 field sales staff in over one hundred countries. After a year of using this platform, Schneider Electric was engaged in 20% more cross-selling across customer opportunities. For a company accustomed to operating in business silos, this demonstrated uncharacteristic business agility. 

Schneider Electric management attributed its effective deployment of cloud to three practices. First, the company followed a lean/agile paradigm—“go fast, go good enough”—to configure and deploy limited functionality as quickly as possible, even if the functionality was far from perfect. This enabled IPO to obtain early feedback from users, which could then be used to improve the platform prior to the next iteration. Second, Schneider Electric deployed across the firm only the standard functionalities offered by Salesforce and severely limited customizations. 

Third, management excluded real-time integration of Salesforce with local systems (e.g., ERPs) from the project’s critical path. Instead, they focused on global, rather than local, data integration requirements for identifying and managing enterprise-wide opportunities. For each customer, the core team created a unique global Customer ID and master customer data record. IPO decided to maintain these master records in the cloud, and to allow local business units to map them back to local records. In this way, Schneider Electric gradually built additional platform capabilities that supported integrated sales, and through reuse, facilitated local business agility. 

Ferrovial

Ferrovial, the Spanish infrastructure group with approximately 57,000 employees and operations in more than twenty-five countries, is another example of a company that understood the importance of a mature digitized platform for competitive agility. IT is now so integral to agility at Ferrovial that its Chief Information Officer became its Chief Information and Innovation Officer. 

In 2008, Ferrovial launched an ambitious strategy to increase the reliability and efficiency of IT operations and align IT with the rest of the business. Until then, due to a large number of historical acquisitions, Ferrovial’s IT needs were handled by a heterogeneous set of ten local IT departments, each working with its own systems and vendors and serving over five hundred internal companies. The business considered IT to be simply a cost center that provided bad service. 

Ferrovial appointed its first CIO and tasked him to simplify, align, and integrate all the IT functions into one coherent central business unit. In the process, several functions—such as infrastructure and communications—were externalized, resulting in savings of up to 20%.[foot]The European Outsourcing Association (EOA) distinguished Ferrovial with the IT Outsourcing Project of the Year award for 2011./foot] With greater control and oversight of IT, Ferrovial increased the quality of IT services. It also centralized all the IT purchases at group level to reduce duplication and fully leverage the buying power of Ferrovial. This resulted in more standardized technologies and cost savings of 25%. 

Having developed and successfully demonstrated its capacity to standardize, integrate, and outsource key aspects of IT, Ferrovial tasked the IT Group to improve Human Resources and Purchasing across the enterprise. After considering various options, the IT Group decided to transfer both to the cloud. 

Transferring HR—and at the time, 70,000 employees—to the cloud took six months instead of the eighteen originally anticipated, saving the company a year’s worth of both time and internal and external resources. Ferrovial achieved these savings in part by conforming to the standards set by cloud service providers. As Florez put it, “We adapted ourselves to the services in the cloud, and not the other way around.”[foot]According to Florez, while Ferrovial could have transferred HR and Purchasing to the cloud before centralizing IT, it would have been significantly more difficult and risky and would have consumed more resources. [/foot]

Ferrovial realized multiple benefits from transferring HR and Purchasing to the cloud. First, as a result of greater platform maturity (and consequently, less operational complexity), two core services were provisioned better and cheaper. Second, the flexibility of cloud-based services enabled Ferrovial to adjust the scale of those services much more quickly in response to acquisitions and divestitures. 

Finally, Ferrovial was also able to refocus resources towards developing innovation capabilities. The IT group now works more closely with business units throughout the organization to leverage new technologies, such as Internet of Things, to develop new product and service offerings. The company established an innovation function, a new culture, and a new process of innovation, leading to five hundred new ideas every two years. In 2014, thirty-five of those ideas became new projects with impact on the P&L. 

Cloud‐Based Digitized Platform Maturity 

Most senior leaders agree that a mature digitized platform is fundamental to efficient and reliable operations. However, in the rush not to be disrupted by competitors, many lose sight of the fact that platform maturity is also essential for competitive agility. IT leaders in companies with immature platforms are under even greater pressure to respond quickly to business opportunities and threats rather than to build platforms. The easy availability of cloud services can aggravate the inclination to address immediate needs with short-term solutions. But as Schneider Electric and Ferrovial demonstrate, an IT group that has already started the process of maturing its digitized platform is in a stronger position to adopt cloud services in a way that simultaneously addresses immediate business needs and further matures a digitized platform. This is an approach that will benefit many companies attempting to make up for lost time. 

Figure 1: Digitized Platform Maturity Is Fundamental to Competitive Agility (N=307)

© 2015 MIT Sloan CISR, Fonstad and Ross. CISR Research Briefings are published monthly to update MIT CISR patrons and sponsors on current research projects. 

About the Authors

Profile picture for user nilsfonstad@mit.edu

Nils O. Fonstad, Research Scientist – Europe and LATAM, MIT Sloan Center for Information Systems Research (CISR)

Profile picture for user jross@mit.edu

Jeanne W. Ross, Director and Principal Research Scientist, MIT Sloan Center for Information Systems Research (CISR)

MIT CENTER FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH (CISR)

Founded in 1974 and grounded in MIT's tradition of combining academic knowledge and practical purpose, MIT CISR helps executives meet the challenge of leading increasingly digital and data-driven organizations. We work directly with digital leaders, executives, and boards to develop our insights. Our consortium forms a global community that comprises more than seventy-five organizations.

MIT CISR Patrons
AlixPartners
Avanade
Axway, Inc.
Collibra
IFS
Pegasystems Inc.
The Ogilvy Group
MIT CISR Sponsors
Alcon Vision
Amcor
ANZ Banking Group (Australia)
AustralianSuper
Banco Bradesco S.A. (Brazil)
Banco do Brasil S.A.
Bank of Queensland (Australia)
Barclays (UK)
BlueScope Steel (Australia)
BNP Paribas (France)
Bupa
CarMax
Caterpillar, Inc.
Cemex (Mexico)
Cencora
Cochlear Limited (Australia)
Commonwealth Superannuation Corp. (Australia)
Cuscal Limited (Australia)
CVS Health
Dawn Foods
DBS Bank Ltd. (Singapore)
Doosan Corporation (Korea)
Fidelity Investments
Fomento Economico Mexicano, S.A.B., de C.V.
Fortum (Finland)
Genentech
Gilbane Building Co.
Johnson & Johnson (J&J)
Kaiser Permanente
King & Wood Mallesons (Australia)
Koç Holding (Turkey)
Mercer
Nasdaq, Inc.
NN Insurance Eurasia NV
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (Japan)
Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. Systems Consulting Division (Japan)
Novo Nordisk A/S (Denmark)
OCP Group
Pacific Life Insurance Company
Posten Bring AS (Norway)
Principal Life Insurance Company
QBE
Ramsay Health Care (Australia)
Raytheon Technologies
Scentre Group Limited (Australia)
Schneider Electric Industries SAS (France)
Stockland (Australia)
Tabcorp Holdings (Australia)
Telstra Limited (Australia)
Terumo Corporation (Japan)
Tetra Pak (Sweden)
Truist Financial Corporation
UniSuper Management Pty Ltd (Australia)
Uniting (Australia)
USAA
Webster Bank, N.A.
Westpac Banking Corporation (Australia)
WestRock Company
Wolters Kluwer
Xenco Medical
Zoetis Services LLC

MIT CISR Associate Members

MIT CISR wishes to thank all of our associate members for their support and contributions.

Find Us
Center for Information Systems Research
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Sloan School of Management
245 First Street, E94-15th Floor
Cambridge, MA 02142
617-253-2348